Formalizing Counterfactual and Nondeterministic Actions in First Order Logic

نویسنده

  • Charles Elkan
چکیده

This short paper outlines some aspects of a method of axiomatizing actions and their effects in standard first-order logic. The method is closely related to other methods using nonmonotonic logics, but the use of first-order logic permits remarkable simplicity. In particular, there is a single, explicit, fixed, and intuitively meaningful frame axiom. Moreover, complex types of inference are possible, including counterfactual reasoning and reasoning about nondeterministic actions.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A Theory of First-Order Counterfactual Reasoning

A new theory of evaluating counterfactual statements is presented based on the established predicate calculus formalism of the Fluent Calculus for reasoning about actions. The assertion of a counterfactual antecedent is axiomatized as the performance of a special action. An existing solution to the Ramification Problem in the Fluent Calculus, where indirect effects of actions are accounted for ...

متن کامل

On the Relation between Situationcalculus and Event

In this paper we make a detailed comparison of the Situation Calculus and the Event Calculus, two logic-based temporal reasoning formalisms. We concentrate on diierences between the calculi, considering the similarities suuciently indicated in the recent literature. We illustrate the inability of Event Calculus to handle counterfactual reasoning problems, and that of Situation Calculus to deal ...

متن کامل

A Logic for Reasoning about Counterfactual Emotions

The aim of this work is to propose a logical framework for the specification of cognitive emotions that are based on counterfactual reasoning about agents’ choices. An example of this kind of emotions is regret. In order to meet this objective, we exploit the well-known STIT logic [Belnap et al., 2001; Horty, 2001]. STIT logic has been proposed in the domain of formal philosophy in the nineties...

متن کامل

Strength Factors: An Uncertainty System for a Quantified Modal Logic

We present a new system S for handling uncertainty in a quantified modal logic (first-order modal logic). The system is based on both probability theory and proof theory. The system is derived from Chisholm’s epistemology. We concretize Chisholm’s system by grounding his undefined and primitive (i.e. foundational) concept of reasonableness in probability and proof theory. S can be useful in sys...

متن کامل

Reasoning by Regression: Pre- and Postdiction Procedures for Logics of Action and Change

In this paper we introduce regression-based pre-and postdiction procedures for PMON, a nonmonotonic logic for action and change with explicit time. We also provide an in depth analysis of problems with regression that occur when nondeterministic actions are introduced. We do this by employing Dijkstra's weakest liberal precondition operator, wlp. The presented work is related to recent work by ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1996